The House of Substance: Looksism

Monday, March 29, 2010

Looksism

UPDATE:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

11 comments:

M. Bouffant said...: Ouch!

Sneaky link. Didn't wanna go there, just see the rest of what was there.; March 29, 2010 at 6:30 PM
Substance McGravitas said...: Now you have filthy cookies.; March 29, 2010 at 6:32 PM
ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...: I'm not looking, and I thank M.B. for taking one for the team.
~; March 29, 2010 at 6:43 PM
Substance McGravitas said...: Dammit, now I've bothered to read the review. It's like Hanlon's parents forced him to do his homework.; March 29, 2010 at 6:46 PM
mikey said...: Well, whatever you're doing, I certainly can't tell what it says. The whole right hand side of the text is cut off.

What?

CLICK it?

Really. Are you out of your Orb-Fucking MIND?

That shit AIN'T gonna happen.

Either the Subber kid moves it over so's I can read it, or we'll move ahead on the assumption it wasn't key to the story anyway...; March 29, 2010 at 8:33 PM
Substance McGravitas said...: Okay, nightmare time.; March 29, 2010 at 9:10 PM
Smut Clyde said...: The whole right hand side of the text is cut off.
You can still read the words "a positive but not a preachy message for young..."
Isn't that enough to say 'Walk, do not run, to the nearest exit'?; March 30, 2010 at 12:59 AM
Hamish Mack said...: A Jude Law remake of Repo Man, is that what they're saying?
Now where's the point in that?; March 30, 2010 at 11:08 AM
ckc (not kc) said...: ... where's the point in that?

I'm with you ... local females beg to differ (possibly some local males, too, also... I haven't asked); March 30, 2010 at 4:06 PM
ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...: Now you've given him some purty stockings to run in.
~; March 30, 2010 at 4:34 PM
Smut Clyde said...: This is why coitus with Darwin Birds is WRONG.; March 30, 2010 at 5:10 PM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)