Andrew C. McCarthy:Was all this not true when Obama was embracing the Bush policy of considering Qaddafi a valuable ally against terrorism and when Obama was pouring taxpayer funds into Qaddafi-run charities?
It's Crazier Andy, so the sentence is not to be taken seriously in its particulars, but hey, I'm willing to say Obama is a hypocritical asshole if the hypocritical asshole judgement now also applies to the hypocritical asshole National Review writers had their heads stuffed in for eight years. If tarring Obama as Bush is their weapon their project as a whole looks kinda silly, huh?
3 comments:
If tarring Obama as Bush is their weapon their project as a whole looks kinda silly, huh?
I will quote Goobie from 3Bulls!:
"Silly makes no sense!"
~
so the sentence is not to be taken seriously in its particulars
You mean I was wasting my time when I scoured the Intertuba for evidence that Obama "considered Qaddafi a valuable ally against terrorism"? Damn.
But yes, it does sound as if National Review is criticising Obama for not shifting tack fast enough from the strategies earlier preferred by National Review.
And hey, shouldn't this be Charlie Sheen by now?
Post a Comment