Monday, August 16, 2010

Lowest Common Thing I Can't Understand

The New York Times translates for the common man:
A University of Notre Dame anthropologist, Susan D. Blum, disturbed by the high rates of reported plagiarism, set out to understand how students view authorship and the written word, or “texts” in Ms. Blum’s academic language.
Whoa there egghead, spare us your p- p- polysybil- polysilly- your crazy talk! Come down from your ivory tower and find a word that means something instead of inventing one!

6 comments:

ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...

If the FSM did not want us to plagiarize, why did He invent control-c and control-v?
~

tigris said...

If academical publications feature photos of boobs are they called "sexts?" Because the kids will all know that word.

J— said...

In an interview, she said the idea of an author whose singular effort creates an original work is rooted in Enlightenment ideas of the individual. It is buttressed by the Western concept of intellectual property rights as secured by copyright law. But both traditions are being challenged.

“Our notion of authorship and originality was born, it flourished, and it may be waning,” Ms. Blum said.


"Publish" or "perish."

Substance McGravitas said...

In an interview, she said the idea of an author whose singular effort creates an original work is rooted in Enlightenment ideas of the individual.

Shakespeare horked our script.

Smut Clyde said...

If academical publications feature photos of boobs

Honest, I only read them for the articles.

“Our notion of authorship and originality was born, it flourished, and it may be waning,” Herr Doktor Bimler said.

Andrew said...

“Our notion of authorship and originality was born, it flourished, and it may be waning,” Ms. Blum said.

Or maybe your students are lazy shits.