If you don’t like a person’s vision for the country, you’re free to debate that vision. If you don’t like their ideas, you’re free to propose better ideas. But, especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible.While I, as all Broderian citizens must, condemn the blood libel of Bad Talk Or Something against the race of conservatives, I have not yet seen it demonstrated to my satisfaction that the conservative race is free of the taint of child-eating. Perhaps when I run into a conservative down at the country club (HA!*) I will see if he dabs his lips with an AB/CD shirt.
In any case, to which appendage does one address a question?
*As if a scuttling penny-pinching conservative would cough up the dough to join a country club even if we let them in. Which we WILL NOT.
15 comments:
Protocols of the Elder-Gods of Zion?
Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own... not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with those who proudly voted in the last election.
Moose droppings from the Queen. She is completely self unaware. Does she feel that her rhetoric has no impact? How did people get around to voting for her then? Or is it only the good stuff that counts
Incidentally Mr. McGravitas will be hearing from lawyers for the House of Riddled Fine Dining restaurant with regard to his publishing photos of the new Coconut jelly and Stromapod cone, Icy Treat, before the release date, Sir.
my bolding BTW
"*As if a scuttling penny-pinching conservative would cough up the dough to join a country club even if we let them in. Which we WILL NOT."
Hee!
law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights.
Now that the 1st and 2nd amendments have been bundled together, is there a new name for the combination?
I hope that Canada will be accepting refugees when the anti-republican Blood Libel escalates to the inevitable anti-republican Pogrom and Holocaust.
Coconut jelly and Stromapod cone, Icy Treat
It's so good you'll be a raving and drooling madman unable to do more than jabber about the black abysses of R'lyeh before you are eaten by invisible monsters.
I hope that Canada will be accepting refugees
I am sure our record will be as good as ever.
Now that the 1st and 2nd amendments have been bundled together, is there a new name for the combination?
It's known as the 1²th amendment, which affirms the right of the people, while bearing arms, to react to the duly protected speech of others that nevertheless offends them by shooting the speaker multiple times through the thorax.
This Loughner kid must really hate Sarah Palin to cause her so much grief. That proves he's a liberal.
There are only two kinds of people: Sarah+ and Sarah-. Requires a blood test obviously.
Is this the tentacle porn site I was searching for?
~
Keep stoking those Google furnaces.
St. Sarah says:
If you don’t like a person’s vision for the country, you’re free to debate that vision.
On a related note, please see the bottom of this screen shot.
Saying that some things some people said are reprehensible and could incite violence is reprehensible and could incite violence.
law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies
Uh, it's the 2nd amendment worship that freaks me out.
Post a Comment