Monday, August 10, 2009

In Further, Deeper Discussions of Aesthetics...

G.I. Joe: The After Action Report, pt. 2 [John J. Miller]
Today was a travel day, so I didn't have a chance to say much this morning about the G.I. Joe movie, which I saw last night. But I wanted to expand on one of my points. The movie contains all kinds of military equipment from high-tech fantasyland: nanotech bombs, robocop uniforms, etc. It's the kind of movie that features a vast, secret lair full of bad guys beneath the polar ice cap.

But for all the gee-whiz gadgetry, what's the one thing that nobody seems to have? Missile defense. Yet our country already has built a rudimentary system. It will grow more robust if the Obama administration reverses course on plans to slash its budget.

I guess Hollywood thinks personal accelerator suits are more likely a part of our future than ABMs.
Men may wish to catch their ladies as they faint: GI Joe may not appear plausible to your little boy conservative pundit.

56 comments:

  1. Penus Penus Penus!

    Hey that's how 3Bulls! speels it, and who am i to box with [strike]dog[/strike] Pinko Punko?

    P.S. Foroku you,Your HTML cannot be accepted: Tag is not allowed: [strike!]!
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thunder is struggling to come to terms with our Digital Masters.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thunder is the thrall of their hegemony.
    I thought GIJoe was a wankfest for adolescents not a basis for DoD decisions. Fuck, but American politics is difficult for those of us from the edge of the world.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So I was watching PTI the other day (Hey, I'm unemployed, what do you expect me to do?) and the sponsor was this GI Joe movie.

    The thing I thought was weird is that at the end of the commercial they said it was "innappropriate for children under 13".

    What? GI JOE? A DOLL for adolescent boys? And they want them to be unwelcome at the MOVIE?

    I'm so fucking confused...

    ReplyDelete
  5. well, it's easy mikey.

    It's aimed at the guys who were 13 when the cartoon was on, and have been living an arrested adolescence ever since.

    A self respecting 13 year old today is out cooking meth or torching hobos, not playing with dolls.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The cartoon went hand in hand with Joe's shrinkage to teeny action figure. No more bendable wrists!

    ReplyDelete
  7. mikey, PTI watching is perfectly OK. It's watching ATH that can be trouble.

    Saw two or three minutes of GIJOE Sat. at the multiplex, trying to recoup some of the $23.50 + parking spent on another feature, came in right at the end where the icecap was about to be exploded. Loud, fast, not much dialog. Perfect/best for music, not necessarily for movies.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Miller's not completely off the mark, however much his machismo offends sensitive liberal types like SubMcG.

    Grunts have become more or less expendable in the age of the USS Hillary supercarriers.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Machismo isn't "offensive," just stupid, boring & transparent.

    And just when weren't "grunts" expendable?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Many a liberal ho objects to grunt machismo--at least of sarge schultz sort--until friday night comes 'round, and she takes one home, and takes the machismo, like, up the grunt-hole. Though the grunt's now more likely to be like wesley snipes than sarge schultz


    Grunts are not expendable to ho-wood tho. About every movie of the week--orcartoon for that matter-- depends on 'em (as does the usual flagwaving journalist, demo or GOPer).

    Heh heh. Keepin' it real as F.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hmm.

    It LOOKS like english.

    The individual words are clear enough. They just aren't put together in any kind of order that makes sense.

    What is all this "grunts"? The US Army is a very large organization. Bigger than IBM or BP or even Google.

    You can find a grunt (I assume you mean eleven bravo, infantry rifleman) who will agree with anything, even incoherent ranting.

    I wore LPCs for the 1st Cav. I jumped out of hueys and watched tearfully as they lifted out of the LZ and left us in the boonies. To an uncertain fate.

    Now I'm sure that has contributed richly to my current worldview, but much else has done so, too. Anybody who thinks there is some group called "grunts" is just totally unclear on what they're saying...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Nothing is bigger than Google. Nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Miller's not completely off the mark, however much his machismo offends sensitive liberal types like SubMcG.

    Your imagination is noted.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It makes poi-fect sense, and as usual the writing's free of pop-liberal sentimentality (does that mean we support the GOP?? Nyet, except to nitwits). Just not your usual fare, so sort of scares you.

    Grunts are soldiers, more or less. The ones who responded to a draft card, I might salute. The enlistee, nyet.

    ReplyDelete
  15. poi-fect sense

    Step away from the taro root.

    Ok, sure, you can sustain your existence with it, but it does not taste good. No matter how it's prepared.

    Ok, sliced thin and deep fried, taro chips with malt vinegar are pretty good.

    But I'm suspicious. I'm kind of wondering if it's the malt vinegar and not the taro.

    'Scuse me. I gotta heake

    ReplyDelete
  16. More like Nietzsche and Darwinism, applied.

    Maybe start by reading the cliffsnotes to Nietzsche, instead of like TandyCo manuals.

    And while GI Joe's only a flick, Miller was correct insofar that in terms of materiel, the US is now playing catchup with Russia and China in many areas. Check out say some of Russia's new "Birch" ICBMs--north beach in less than 30 minutes, and as powerful as anything the USA has. They have superior missile defenses as well. For that matter, google the chinese infantry (probably 5 times that of the USA)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Look, I totally don't wanna be a dick here. But I was just chopping bell pepper and it occurred to me to wonder:

    What must it be like to be Mrs. J?

    "When you're sent to penny fights and alldshor it"...

    ReplyDelete
  18. For that matter, google the chinese infantry (probably 5 times that of the USA)

    Why? Are they going to swim here, or else take over all the good chess-playing jobs?
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  19. sargeant schulz was macho?

    I do not think that word means what you think it means...

    ReplyDelete
  20. You want macho? Watch me pound my poi.

    ReplyDelete
  21. [Ring Ring... Ring Ring ]

    Hello?

    Umm, hello? Is this the chinese infantry?

    Yes, yes, this is the chinese infantry. Can I help you?

    I was just wondering...Are you gonna invade?

    Invade? Invade WHAT?

    Well, the US. Are you going to invade the US?

    The US??? Are you outta your mind? Those are some dog - crazy motherfuckers. We spend at least half our time trying to convince those idiots we're NOT invading. What are you, stupid?

    No, I just heard you were like five times bigger than our infantry, and I got scared.

    Well, c'mon. Yeah, there's a whole lot of us. But when you're a poor country living under single-party rule and you're trying to keep things from blowing up, you need to have full employment. So we have a bunch of kids in the military. Look, these are kids who can't write their name. Many of them have wooden replica AKs - hell, we don't want to issue these villagers and peasants REAL weapons.

    And don't even get me started on those fucking crazy Uigers. Those bastards you can't even HAVE in the cities. Trust me, sewage everywhere.

    So...You're NOT going to invade then...

    Nope. No chance. The whole world knows. The US does wars while the rest of us do commerce. Notice who's economy is growing and who's is shrinking? You think there's some kind of accidental coincidence in that? Look, I gotta go. Time for group exercise. Don't worry about us so much, seems to us like your own government is fucking you over plenty good....

    ReplyDelete
  22. J, whatever it is you think you're reading, you're not reading it, whatever it is you think I'm thinking, I'm not thinking it.

    Really, whether Miller is accurate or not is neither here nor there to the funny in his post, in which a grown man ruminates on missile defense given the example of Hydra.

    You can certainly defend his stance, as blockheads defend the asinine, but I don't think you can pretend to have gotten the joke at this point. Machismo simply doesn't play a part when it's a toy-tie-in movie.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I like Ben Shapiro's approach. He knew the movie was un-American well before it came out because he read the G.I. Joe crew was international.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Damn those internationalists from other countries...


    Oh gross I got an exarm here. ZRM is this yours!!??!!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Ah it's not your favorite euro Ahht flick or something? Too 'Merican? Low brow? Rah-thurr.

    SubMcG, you sound more Anglo-tory with each post, dearie.

    Even if it's just manga (and if GI Joe's too international), there are reasons to be concerned about missile defense issues (and materiel issues in general).

    ReplyDelete
  26. there are reasons to be concerned about missile defense issues

    No shit guy, but not the subject of the post.

    Please, when you're on the verge of understanding something, hold back. Can't be true.

    ReplyDelete
  27. You could work on a PC GIJoe sequel, SubMcG! (tho' it's already looking fairly PC).

    Don't ask; Don't Tell: GI Joe in Hot Baghdad Nites

    ReplyDelete
  28. Well, SubMc-Reason, your attempt to ridicule Miller misses the point. Do you mean to suggest he should not even attempt to extract some political point from a kid flick? Or just your usual ad homs. You're the one conflating the aesthetics with the political, via your own usual faux-liberal code.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Do you mean to suggest he should not even attempt to extract some political point from a kid flick?

    I am fully in favour of him extracting a political point wherever he finds it. You let me know when he does that.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Dragon-King WangchuckAugust 12, 2009 at 4:53 AM

    Do you mean to suggest he should not even attempt to extract some political point from a kid flick?

    Oooh, that's a harsh stinging rebuke. Summer action blockbusters targetted at children are, of course, the absolute most valid milieu to be searching for social/political commentary - and Subby McGravol is on shaky ground to suggest otherwise.


    That's right McGravitas - you are the tyrannical dictator stomping all over Free Speech. I bet that realization is gonna force you to write "hypocrite" all over your Lie-beral Islamofascist ID card in indeliable marker.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Do you mean to suggest he should not even attempt to extract some political point from a kid flick?

    Right after he manages to extract vanilla pudding from a guinea pig.

    Seriously, is the only point that you LIKE missiles? See thunderpoint in the first comment.

    ReplyDelete
  32. 2 Girls 1 Cup: no missile defense in that one either.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Au contraire, McGravy.

    2 Girls 1 Cup makes my missile go limp and completely useless.

    Now THATS missile defense.

    I gotta go get a sammich at the ountimat

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  35. That's right McGravitas - you are the tyrannical dictator stomping all over Free Speech.

    Well, when it comes to J, sure, that's me, sometimes just because it's funny.

    This angers the war god Aress.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I think you're funny, jewboys.

    In a pathetic way. The SubMcG possay's not really even democrats---parlor-crats!

    You're probably following some gangstas' orders to diss Miller/NRO, or maybe it's your mother, or....NAMBLA staff perhaps.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Well, yes. Of course.

    I'm actually here representing the National Association of Black Libertarian Archivists.

    Ok, sure, we don't have a LARGE membership, but we have a surprising level of political clout.

    wigerem?

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think you're funny, jewboys.

    Mazeltov! This is all I strive for!

    ReplyDelete
  39. I'm here at the orders of AZAAG.

    Associated Zombies and Assorted Ghouls.

    Yeah, keep bringing the Democrat purity demands though.

    ReplyDelete
  40. J at 10:04 AM brings the funny and wins the thread. Come get your reward: a big misal!

    ReplyDelete
  41. I need to drop some acid and reread this thread. Maybe then it would make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Now, was that ordered by your n-gah boss, or your supervisors at NAMBLA-Co, SubMcG? Rock on, NAMBLA-crats of Cafe SubMcG

    Nada mas que

    CHANDALA

    ReplyDelete
  43. I need to drop some acid and reread this thread.

    Sources have informed me that you are a jewboy in good standing with NAMBLA, so... Y'got any?

    ReplyDelete
  44. Look, lemme be frank here with you jewboys. I got nothing against your funny little beanie and your unkempt facial hair, to each his own,y'know?

    But this utter lack of recognition for the irish catholic atheist drunkard contingent of McG's Jewboys is offensive and, well, hasati!

    ReplyDelete
  45. Sadly, only muriatic in the house. Captcha thinks he'd better be guings.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Those of us who are presbyterian boys also take some offense at our constant dissing. So we dress nicely and wear haircream ,it looks, god forbid, tidy.

    Capcha rings gently with the resonance of the hog

    ReplyDelete
  47. I need to drop some acid and reread this thread.

    I was just thinking that I chose the wrong thread to give up smoking dried leeches.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Is it worthwhile to mention that leeches smoke much more, er, pungently before they're dried?

    I thought not.

    I apologize for my distieda

    ReplyDelete
  49. Is it worthwhile to mention that leeches smoke much more, er, pungently before they're dried?

    AND they don't give a shit who's in the elevator with them when they light up.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Well, this is only a one time experience, but smoking leeches after sex is pretty pungent.
    Capcha asks eukosi. Not too bad thanks

    ReplyDelete
  51. Leech porn DO NOT WANT

    ReplyDelete
  52. Also I am concerned by the image of Another Kiwi watching a pair of leeches enjoying their hermaphroditic jollies so he can catch them immediately afterwards and smoke them.
    He is betraying too much about how we roll in NZ.

    ReplyDelete
  53. It is, as the french would not say, Le Joie de Mort.
    Let our love become a funeral pyre.

    You back in Godzone? good Herr Doktor or still lallygagging around the socialist fleshpots?

    ReplyDelete
  54. Too much gagging and not nearly enough lalling.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.